Legal Opinion

Indian Bayou Drainage District v. Dickie

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee is a landowner and taxpayer in the Indian Bayou Drainage District of Lonoke County, and he brought this suit to restrain the commissioners of the district from issuing additional bonds. In his complaint, appellee alleged the organization of the district under act 279 of the Acts of 1909, which act appears as §§ 3607 et seq., C. & M. Digest.

The assessed betterments in the district amounted to $463,428, and against this assessment bonds were issued in the sum of $147,000 from the proceeds of the sale of which the construction cost of the improvement, in accordance with the plans upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. McDaniel v. AshworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Stewart-McGehee Construction Co. v. Brewster & Riley Feed Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Shepherd v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Cox v. Drainage District No. 27, Craighead CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. Newton County Republican Central Committee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Campbell v. Beaver Bayou Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API