Legal Opinion
Thompson v. BD. OF ED., MILLVILLE
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 27, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. Super. 419 (1952)
90 A.2d 63
CLARENCE W. THOMPSON AND RUTH M. THOMPSON, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION, CITY OF MILLVILLE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 16, 1952.
Decided June 27, 1952.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and FRANCIS.
Mr. Nathaniel Rogovoy argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.
Mr. Lawrence N. Park argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. M. Joseph Greenblatt, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.
The question for determination is whether, under the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hoffman v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Milstrey v. City of HackensackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Kress v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Allas v. Borough of RumsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Board of National Missions of Presbyterian Church in the United States v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estelle v. Bd. of Ed., Red BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- HARE EX REL. HARE v. PennellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Thompson v. BD. OF EDUCATION, CITY OF MILLVILLESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Schwartau v. MiesmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958