Legal Opinion
Schwartau v. Miesmer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 3, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
50 N.J. Super. 399 (1958)
142 A.2d 675
HANS SCHWARTAU, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CHARLES MIESMER AND EVELYN MIESMER, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS, AND BOROUGH OF CLOSTER, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 28, 1958.
Decided June 3, 1958.
Before Judges PRICE, HANEMAN and SCHETTINO.
Mr. George Winne argued the cause for defendant-appellant.
Mr. William V. Breslin argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Hammer & Hammer, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.
Appellan…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Melone v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Hammond v. County of MonmouthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Kelley v. CurtissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fagan v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Trent v. Atlantic City Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Galloway v. Employers Mutual of WausauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Harris v. Peridot Chem.(NJ), Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Stoneking v. Orleans VillageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.