United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
In this straightforward criminal case charging defendants with misbranding and adulterating apple juice products, defense counsel, in a brilliant display of imaginative creativity, have attempted in a series of pre-trial motions to convert rather simple allegations contained in the indictment herein into a complex maze of confusing theories based in large part upon their own conceptions of viable defenses. In order to replace everything into proper perspective we must summarize the indictment and analyze their multiple motions separately.
The Indictment
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- United States v. BarretDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. GabrielDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. CarrozzaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.