Legal Opinion
United States v. Gabriel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 1996No. 95 CR 0108 (JSR)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge..'
The pre-trial motions in this case raise important issues regarding the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 1512 and the application of Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 77 S.Ct. 963, 1 L.Ed.2d 931 (1957).
A third superseding indictment (the “Indictment”) charges defendants Gabriel and Vitti, two former executives of the Chromalloy American Corporation, with multiple counts of conspiracy, fraud, false statements and obstruction of justice, in providing commercial airlines with defectively-repaired engine parts and concealing these defects from customers and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. James M. Gabriel, Gerard E. VittiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. OhleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re Copper Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- United States v. MermelsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.