Legal Opinion

State v. Stark

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1966No. 10072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHover, J.

Defendant appeals from an order of the court below denying her application to take the deposition of a witness in a criminal case. On the basis of the record before us it appears that the witness is material, possibly even necessary to the defendant’s case, and that the witness is in military service in South Viet Nam and not amenable to the ordinary subpoena procedures. This court would ordinarly not be authorized to consider an appeal of an interlocutory order, but in. this instance defendant claims a violation of the state Constitution (Section 10, Article I) in that she is being deprived…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tracy v. SuydamNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In re CanterNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State v. AnthoulisOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EberhardtOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. BenaventeSuperior Court of Guam · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API