Simpson v. Budd
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus to the judge of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The fa'cts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
Application for a writ of mandate.
In an action by Simpson and Gray, the petitioners herein, against Peyton et al., tried in the superior court of San Joaquin County, the findings of the court were filed, and judgment thereupon rendered, and entered December 22, 1890, against said petitioners. It does not appear that any notice of the decision was ever served upon petitioners, but on January 2, 1891, a stipulation was filed in said court which shows they had actual knowledge at that date of the rendition of the judgment, and for the purposes of this decision it will be assumed that they had…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hobbs v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Gray v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Patrick v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Curtis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Schieffery v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Reclamation District No. 535 v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Smith v. IbosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.