Legal Opinion
Kordal v. Niesley
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
Notice of civil service promotional examination is important, and must be given properly. This is a case in point.
In June, 1970, the Nassau County Civil Service Commission posted a notice of a competitive examination for the position of captain in the Department of Correction at its office in Mineóla. The qualifications for the test were such that, of the whole world, only four specific lieutenants of the Department of Correction, including Kordal, the petitioner here, were eligible. Only one of those four lieutenants, Lynch, took the test. He passed and was appointed to the rank of captain.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Connaughton v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- People ex rel. Lahey v. WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Public Service Commission for Second DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- 90-92 Wadsworth Avenue Tenants Ass'n v. City of New York Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hutchins v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Goldstein v. Niagara Falls Memorial Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Ridgel v. LavineNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- 301-52 Townhouse Corp. v. ClickNew York Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.