Ridgel v. Lavine
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoses M. Weinstein, J.
By this article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks (1) to set aside respondents’ determinations *22whereby petitioner was denied public assistance in the form of aid to dependent children and (2) to restore the grant of such aid as previously given, retroactive to the date of its termination.
Petitioner commenced subject proceeding within four months after being notified of the adverse determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, but more than four months after the commissioner rendered the determination. Nevertheless, this proceeding is not barred by CPLR…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kordal v. NiesleyNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Stallone v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Skerret v. BergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Goldstein v. Niagara Falls Memorial Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Achey v. D'EliaNew York Supreme Court · 1982