Dolin v. Wachter
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
In this case the lower court entered judgment that plaintiff take nothing. He appeals from the judgment.
As trial was had upon an agreed statement of facts, we shall not stop to consider questions respecting the form of the action, but shall proceed to determine the ease, so far as may be, upon the merits. (United States Nat. Bank v. Great Western Sugar Co., 60 Mont. 342, 199 Pac. 245.)
It appears the plaintiff purchased mortgaged lands from one Sorenson, which then were in the possession of the defendant, who held the same under a “crop contract” entered into between Sorenson and himself.'…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Citizens' National Bank v. Western Loan & Building Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
- Wells-Dickey Co. v. EmbodyMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Berne v. StevensMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Cook-Reynolds Co. v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marias River Syndicate v. Big West Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Williard v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Davis v. BurtonMontana Supreme Court · 1952
- Union Central Life Insurance v. AudetMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Erie v. Wahl, State Liq. Con. Adm.Montana Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.