Legal Opinion

Layton City v. Brierley

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 13, 2015No. 20140496-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOOMEY, Judge:

{1 In this interlocutory appeal, Layton City appeals from the district court's grant of: Defendant Chelse Marie Brierley's motion to suppress evidence obtained after the war-rantless entry of her residence. Because we agree with the City that the inevitable discovery doctrine applies to the suppressed evidence in this case, we reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

T2 On September 30, 2018, police officers received a report that a black Mercedes SUV, driven by a "blonde female," was seen leaving the site of a hit-and-run accident. 1 Dispatch gave the officers the reported license…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States of America, -Appellee v. Larry SouzaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brierley v. Layton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API