Legal Opinion

Aspen Enterprises, Inc. v. Bodge

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1995No. D018819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

Plaintiff Aspen Enterprises, Inc. (Aspen) sued defendants Gerald and Karen Bodge (collectively Bodge) on a promissory note secured by both real property and personal property. At the outset of the action Aspen repossessed personal property collateral consisting of an inventory of new tires. At trial, the court granted Bodge’s motion for nonsuit based on what was stipulated to be Aspen’s opening statement, concluding Aspen was barred under the California Uniform Commercial Code from seeking a deficiency judgment.

Aspen appeals the grant of nonsuit, contending: (1) its cause of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. State Bank of Towner v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Florio v. LauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Brett Lauter v. Michael RosenblattDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  3. Clark v. EZN, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Sandton Agriculture Investments III, LLC v. 4-S Ranch Partners, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API