Legal Opinion
Joseph L. Howard v. City of Beavercreek
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 9, 2002No. 00-4143PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph L. Howard brought suit against the defendant City of Beavercreek (“Beavercreek”) alleging that the denial of his request for a variance to Beavercreek’s zoning law to accommodate his handicap violated 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(B) of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (“FHAA”) and subsections 4112.02(H)(1), (4), (18), and (19) of the Ohio Revised Code. Howard appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Beavercreek. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
Howard owns a home in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smith & Lee Associates, Inc. United States of America v. City of Taylor, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Alisha Bronk and Monica Jay v. Bernhard IneichenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Richard McGary v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Anderson Ex Rel. C.A. v. City of Blue AshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Schwarz v. City of Treasure IslandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Charles Hollis, Jr. v. Chestnut Bend Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Giebeler v. M & B ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.