Getto v. Binkert
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from- Sedgwick Court of C-ommon Pleas. ActioN by Binkert and. others against Getto to recover on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiffs. The defendant brings the case here. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion herein, filed July 6, 1895.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Martin, C. J. :
The original action was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error in the court of common pleas, November 14, 1890, to recover upon a promissory note for $3,075, dated July 3, 1886, and payable to the order of S. Kingsbaker & Bros, one day after date, with interest at 6 per cent, per annum. It was indorsed after maturity to the defendants in error, and the plaintiff in error paid interest upon it to July 3, 1889. Louis Kingsbaker was a traveling salesman and a member of the firm of S. Kingsbaker & Bros., of Quincy,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of Auditors v. BenoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Babcock v. D. Deford & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Simpson v. MundeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
- Johnson v. Whitman Agricultural Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Warner v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rottman v. HevenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Cherokee County v. . MeroneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Colvin v. GoffOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Macksville State Bank v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Royer v. Western Silo Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.