Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mountain States Beet Growers Marketing Ass'n v. Monroe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 9, 1928No. 12,118Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Adams

specially concurring.

It occurs to me that the most powerful and unanswerable argument in favor of the affirmance of the judgment, *312lias been put in the hands of the growers by counsel for the association themselves. Whatever may be said for or against the slowness or deliberation, and ultimate failure of the association to sell the 1928 beets, there was no lack of interest when the case got to this court. We were asked to advance it on the calendar, which we did. On June 7, 1928, a joint motion was filed by all of the attorneys for the litigants, and signed also by the attorney for the sugar…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Montana Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Rifle Potato Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Joralmon v. McPheeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  5. Gabriel v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API