Legal Opinion

Economy Fire and Cas. Co. v. Goar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1989No. 87-1101PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

551 So.2d 957 (1989)

ECONOMY FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY

v.

Charles GOAR.

87-1101.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 30, 1989.

Rehearing Denied September 1, 1989.

Steven E. Haddock of Hardwick, Knight & Haddock, Decatur, for appellant.

Byrd R. Latham of Patton, Latham, Legge & Cole, Athens, for appellee.

2Per curiam

As subrogee to the rights of its insureds, Loyd and Rosella Pugh, Economy Fire and Casualty Company appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Charles Goar on its third-party complaint against Goar for damages resulting from an accident involving a cattle trailer owned by Goar but loaned to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rowden v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Penton v. FavorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Martin v. LUKIE & FORNEY, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. John R. Cowley & Bros., Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. J.M.V. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. James v. Hornady Truck Line, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Livingston v. Auto Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API