Legal Opinion
Dye v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 11, 1915No. 19,668PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Finney district court; George J. DOWNER, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court refusing to discharge an attachment. The plaintiff caused an attachment to be levied on a Denver & Rio Grande cattle car standing on the tracks of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company at Garden City, Kan. The Santa Fe moved to discharge the attachment, and on this being denied filed an interplea, upon which issue was-joined, trial was had, and judgment was rendered there.on in favor of the plaintiff. The Santa Fe, still claiming the car, then gave the sheriff a forthcoming…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Wall v. N. & W. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- Connery v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Michigan Central Railroad v. Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
- Woods-Egan Live-Stock Commission Co. v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dye v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917