Legal Opinion
Roesch v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 17, 1993No. 93-03086PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
627 So.2d 57 (1993)
James Allen ROESCH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-03086.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
November 17, 1993.
2Per curiam
James Roesch appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The motion raises numerous grounds, but we find potential merit in only one. Roesch alleges that he provided his trial attorney with the names of witnesses who would testify he was in St. Augustine at the time these offenses occurred in Lakeland.[1] If this is true, and counsel had no valid reason for failing to…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanborn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Majewski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Bailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
4Cited by7 opinions
- Cabrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Light v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Mathis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- TAKENDRICK CAMPBELL v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Lamb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.