King v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
RYDER, Chief Judge.
Arnett King appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We reverse.
King alleges that a demand for speedy trial was filed, but that trial counsel failed to move for discharge after sixty days had expired. If true, this could constitute ineffective assistance. See, e.g., Bradfield v. State, 466 So.2d 273 (Fla.2d DCA 1985).
We remand this case with directions either to grant King a hearing on his motion or to attach sufficient portions of the record to demonstrate conclusively that King is not entitled to relief. If the trial court again denies the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bradfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roesch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Cambrick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Constantine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990