Legal Opinion
Bailey v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 17, 1993No. 92-01614PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence in all respects, with the exception of a clerical error in the judgment. On remand, the trial court shall correct the judgment to reflect the jury verdict and the trial court’s oral pronouncement that the conviction on count II was for misdemeanor petit theft rather than grand theft.
RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND; JJ., concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Roesch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993