Legal Opinion

Hudkins v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 1945No. 4-7609PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

The “ salaried physician” referred to in Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry, 206 Ark. 671, 177 S. W. 2d 410, severed his relations with National Optical Stores Company and was succeeded by Dr. Ira N. Hudkins. Jack Rosenthal, who was Little Rock manager for the Company, likewise resigned. His place was filled by Theodore Kays. By certiorari Kays and Hudkins have brought here a record of proceedings had in Pulaski Chancery 'Court, including a finding that the petitioners were guilty of contempt in that they willfully violated injunctive mandates, validity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Melton v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Lyric Theater v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  5. Beeson v. Chambers, ChancellorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dennison v. MobleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Meyer v. SeifertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Hickinbotham v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Lucy v. AdamsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1963
  5. Phillips v. Arkansas Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API