Naumburg v. Hyatt
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina
Motion in the Cause.
1Opinion of the CourtDick, J.
The fund in controversy between the parties to this motion came into the possession and under the control of this court by virtue of attachment proceedings instituted by the plaintiffs as a provisional remedy in their civil action, commenced on the eighteenth day of October, 1884, to recover a debt of the defendants, J. E. Hyatt and J. Willis, merchants, trading under the name and style of “ J. R. Hyatt & Co. ” The warrant of attachment was founded upon an affidavit of an agent of the plaintiffs, alleging that the defendants, on the ninth day of October, 1884, with the intent to hinder and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fink v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Van Norden v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washington-Alaska Bank v. Dexter Horton Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Palmer-Haworth Logging Co. v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Fletcher v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Hoover & Wood Ward v. HaslageHuron County Court of Common Pleas · 1897
- Lowenberg v. JefferiesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1896