Legal Opinion
Washington-Alaska Bank v. Dexter Horton Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1920No. 3218PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The appellant contends that there remained due only $4,510.67 of the appellee’s original claim after applying the $25,000 payment of August 6, 1912, and the net amount which was realized on the foreclosure sale, and that the remainder of the appellee’s claim, as allowed by the court below, represents interest, which the appellee was not entitled to receive out of the estate in the hands of the receiver. The court below applied the rule established in Merrill v. National Bank of Jacksonville, 173 U.S. 131, 19 S.Ct. 360, 43 L.Ed. 640, that the creditor can…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Guilford v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ticonic National Bank v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Centropolis Bank of Kansas City, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. United Financial Group, Inc., R. J. Wolf, Claimant-Appellant v. William E. Tassock, ReceiverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- E. C. Warner Co. v. W. B. Foshay Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- In Re BurchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.