Legal Opinion

Yellow Cab Operating Co. v. McNamara

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1935No. 26062PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries which resulted .after a collision of a Dixie taxicab and a Yellow taxicab at Grand and Broadway in Oklahoma City. The plaintiff was an employee of the Dixie Cab Company, and according to his testimony was riding as a paid passenger with a companion, also an employee of the company, in a cab driven by a driver of the said Dixie Cab Company. Thus all three of the occupants of the Dixie cab were employees of the Dixie Cab Company, and the plaintiff and his companion were on the way home from work.

The testimony is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Ten Cate v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Hall v. PolsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Billy v. Le Flore County Gas Elec. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooke v. TownleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Oklahoma Steel Castings Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Oklahoma City v. LeggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Kurn v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Cooke v. TownleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API