Legal Opinion

Zale Corporation v. Rosenbaum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1974No. 6397PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PRESLAR, Chief Justice.

This is a summary judgment case in which the defendants’ plea of limitations was sustained by the Court. We affirm.

Appellant, Zale Corporation, as plaintiff, brought this suit against defendants, Louis Rosenbaum, Albert Malooly, Charles H. Newman, Individually and d/b/a C. H. Newman Development Company, and Mc-Cracken Construction Company, alleging that the defendants were negligent in such a way as to cause the plaintiff to suffer flood damage. The trial Court sustained the motions for summary judgment of each of the defendants based on their affirmative defense…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Torres v. Western Casualty and Surety CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rigo Manufacturing Company v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Garcia v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Ardila v. Saavedra, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  4. Humble Exploration Co. v. Amcap Petroleum Associates-1977, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  5. Ardila v. Saavedra, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API