Legal Opinion
United States v. Shirley May Rigdon, Formerly Shirley May Kirschenmann
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1963No. 18266PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacBRIDE, District Judge.
This is an action by Shirley May Rig-don (formerly Shirley May Kirschen-mann) to recover taxes alleged to have been erroneously or illegally collected.
The facts may be stated as follows, for purposes of this appeal: 1
Henry Kirschenmann and his wife conveyed their interest in a quarter section of farm land to their minor daughter, Shirley, without consideration. One day after the conveyance, Edward Kirschenmann, Shirley’s uncle, filed a petition for appointment as guardian of her estate. One month after the conveyance, he was appointed guardian of her estate. Two weeks…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guardianship of ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Kirschenmann v. WestoverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Olaf E. Taxeraas, Administrator of the Estate of Carl Taxeraas and Irene Taxeraas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Rigdon v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Maria De La Luz Viruette Torres v. Richard C. Hoy, Acting Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los Angeles, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aaron L. Kolom and Serita Kolom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Benenson v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Knowles Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Sterno Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Sterno Sales Corporation v. The United States. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Transferee and Successor of Sterno Corporation (Dissolved) and Sterno Sales Corporation (Dissolved) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965