Legal Opinion
Benenson v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1966No. 64 Civ. 1445PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LEVET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Charles B. Benenson and Dorothy Cullman, seek a refund of tax deficiencies paid by plaintiffs on federal income tax returns for the taxable years 1955 and 1956.
This case was heard on a stipulation of facts. After examining the stipulation, the exhibits, the pleadings, the briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by counsel, this court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Charles B. Benenson (“Benenson”) and Dorothy Cullman (formerly Dorothy…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Eli D. Goodstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Eli D. GoodsteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charles D. REICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOW BADISCHE COMPANY and Dow Chemical Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Charles B. Benenson and Dorothy Cullman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Hollie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- National Newark & Essex Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Alisa v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.