Legal Opinion

Hill v. Jackson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

— This is an action against a dentist for malpractice. The cause was filed in Vernon county, but the venue was changed to Jasper county where plaintiff recovered and defendant appealed.

It is alleged that while extracting plaintiff’s teeth defendant negligently dislocated her jaw and negligently failed to discover that he had done so and negligently failed to replace and reset it and failed to advise plaintiff that her jaw was dislocated. The answer is a general denial and a plea of contributory negligence. The reply is a general denial.

August 8, 1921, plaintiff consulted defendant about her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seewald v. GentryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Hiill v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Bank of Malden v. StokesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Pedigo v. RoseberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Calkins v. EngleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API