Legal Opinion

Pedigo v. Roseberry

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 11, 1937PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jess Pedigo, respondent, instituted a civil malpractice action against Drs. E.C. Roseberry and P.A. Holmes, appellants, for $40,000 damages. The jury returned a verdict for appellants. Respondent's motion for new trial was sustained and appellants appealed. The case reaches the writer upon reassignment.

[1] Appellants filed the statutory affidavit for appeal, which (omitting matter not material here) stated the appeal was prayed for because affiant "considers defendants aggrieved by the judgment and decision of the court. . . ." The record recited appellants filed their affidavit "praying the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Scanlon v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Conduitt v. Trentonton Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Grindstaff v. J. Goldberg & Sons Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Aiken Ex Rel. Aiken v. ClarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Hildreth v. KeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Hurlock v. Park Lane Medical Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API