Hiill v. Jackson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
-This is a malpractice suit. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $1500 and defendant has appealed.
The petition alleges— “. . . that defendant in extracting plaintiff’s teeth as aforesaid did negligently, carelessly and unskillfully dislocate her jaw in so doing and did negligently and carelessly fail to discover that he had dislocated the same, and did negligently and carelessly fail to replace and reset it and to advise plaintiff that he had so dislocated it.”
The facts show that plaintiff, as the result of a severe case of pyorrhea, suffered from inflammation of the gums…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McGrath v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Ferguson v. Davis CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Spain v. BurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Nevinger v. HaunMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
- Pate v. DumbauldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Burgess v. Garvin Price Merc. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- Smith v. . McClungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Ellering v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Snyder v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.