Legal Opinion

Ruric Huff and Nannie Huff v. Whitesburg Logging Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1985No. 83-5804Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

758 F.2d 653

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

RURIC HUFF AND NANNIE HUFF, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,

v.

WHITESBURG LOGGING COMPANY.

NO. 83-5804

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

2/1/85

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

BEFORE: KEITH and JONES, Circuit Judges; and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

2Per curiam

1

Appellan…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arthur v. HumbleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Kentucky Land & Immigration Co. v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  3. Smith v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840
  4. Smith v. NowellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822
  5. Beaty v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API