Legal Opinion

Beaty v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 4, 1840PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Ejectment. From the Circuit Court for Estill County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Ewing

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

We understand the verdict of the jury as finding the defendants guilty of the trespass and ejectment as to the whole land, on the demises designated by them in the ver. diet. They have not found as to a pari, divided or undivided, so as to limit their finding to any quantity less than the whole; and it does not appear by the record, at the other lessors, upon whose demises they had not found, were entitled to any interest in the land in contest, or that they were heirs of John South, or that the interests of those Upon whose demises they have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cardwell v. Sprigg's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crowley v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
  2. Travis v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Baley v. DeakinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1844
  4. Devor v. WoolfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
  5. Ruric Huff and Nannie Huff v. Whitesburg Logging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API