Legal Opinion · Dissent

James P. v. Children & Youth Services

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 1984No. Nos. 2776 and 2793Published

1DissentCirillo, Judge

Although I am in agreement with the majority’s position as to the scope of appellate review in the termination of parental rights, I respectfully dissent from the finding that the requisite grounds for termination have not been established by clear and convincing evidence in the instant matter.

I share in the concern of the courts in insuring that termination be granted only as a last resort, since, by its nature, it is a procedure by which family life is irretrievably destroyed. See Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L,Ed.2d 599 (1982). But when there no longer exists a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re William L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. La Rocca TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. In Re HowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In the Interest of T. S. L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API