James P. v. Children & Youth Services
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentCirillo, Judge
Although I am in agreement with the majority’s position as to the scope of appellate review in the termination of parental rights, I respectfully dissent from the finding that the requisite grounds for termination have not been established by clear and convincing evidence in the instant matter.
I share in the concern of the courts in insuring that termination be granted only as a last resort, since, by its nature, it is a procedure by which family life is irretrievably destroyed. See Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L,Ed.2d 599 (1982). But when there no longer exists a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re William L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- La Rocca TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- In Re HowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- In the Interest of T. S. L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.