Legal Opinion

In Re Howard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1976PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POMEROY, Justice.

This is an appeal by Julius and Lottie Denson from a denial of their petition to terminate involuntarily the parental rights of Lucille M. Daoust 1 in her infant child, Latasha Howard, of whom the Densons are legal guardians. The petition prayed that Miss Daoust’s parental rights be terminated under either § 311(1) or § 311(2) of the Adoption Act of 1970, Act of July 24, 1970, P.L. 620, 1 P.S. § 311 [hereinafter referred to as § 311]. 2 After a hearing the trial court concluded that the legal justifications for involuntary termination of parental rights set forth in §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of McCraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Appeal of Diane B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Harvey Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. In Re Adoption of FarabelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. In Re Adoption of McAhrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re the Interest of C.K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In Re Adoption of Melissa P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. In Re Adoption of James J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. In re Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights To W. M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. In Re Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights of SanteliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API