In Re Howard
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POMEROY, Justice.
This is an appeal by Julius and Lottie Denson from a denial of their petition to terminate involuntarily the parental rights of Lucille M. Daoust 1 in her infant child, Latasha Howard, of whom the Densons are legal guardians. The petition prayed that Miss Daoust’s parental rights be terminated under either § 311(1) or § 311(2) of the Adoption Act of 1970, Act of July 24, 1970, P.L. 620, 1 P.S. § 311 [hereinafter referred to as § 311]. 2 After a hearing the trial court concluded that the legal justifications for involuntary termination of parental rights set forth in §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Adoption of McCraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Appeal of Diane B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Harvey Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- In Re Adoption of FarabelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In Re Adoption of McAhrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re the Interest of C.K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Adoption of Melissa P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- In Re Adoption of James J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- In re Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights To W. M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- In Re Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights of SanteliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.