Legal Opinion · Dissent

Medvalusa Health Programs, Inc. v. Memberworks, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 17, 2005No. 17116, 17117Published

1Dissent

*667ZARELLA, J., with whom NORCOTT, J., joins,

dissenting. I agree with the majority insofar as it holds that the judicial confirmation of an arbitration award does not constitute state action. I disagree with and am perplexed by the majority’s conclusion in part I B of its opinion that this state does not have a well-defined and dominant public policy against excessive punitive damage awards. In my view, such a policy is evident in case law that spans nearly a century and is a foundational principle of any dispute resolution system, including arbitration. Because I believe that a $5 million…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. James K. Lee v. Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API