Medvalusa Health Programs, Inc. v. Memberworks, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Dissent
*667ZARELLA, J., with whom NORCOTT, J., joins,
dissenting. I agree with the majority insofar as it holds that the judicial confirmation of an arbitration award does not constitute state action. I disagree with and am perplexed by the majority’s conclusion in part I B of its opinion that this state does not have a well-defined and dominant public policy against excessive punitive damage awards. In my view, such a policy is evident in case law that spans nearly a century and is a foundational principle of any dispute resolution system, including arbitration. Because I believe that a $5 million…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- James K. Lee v. Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.