Legal Opinion

Halas v. Yale Rubber Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1969No. Calendar 17, Docket 51,962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

We accept defendant-appellant’s “statement of facts and proceedings” as follows:

“Plaintiff-appellee, Frank Halas, hereinafter referred to as claimant, while employed by Yale Rubber Manufacturing Company, suffered an accident on October 21, 1950, which resulted in the amputation of both of his hands. He had at the time an average weekly wage of $95.09 and was an unskilled employee in the field of common labor. At the time of the accident, he had a wife and two minor children as dependents. He presently has two dependents, his wife and a daughter, Betty Jane, a student, who was born January 7,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. MacDonald v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Geis v. Packard Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Liesinger v. Owen-Ames-Kimball Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. King v. Second Injury FundMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Martin v. Somberg-Berlin Metals Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Valt v. Woodall Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Brady v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API