Legal Opinion

Liesinger v. Owen-Ames-Kimball Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1966No. Calendar 2, Docket 50,617PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

Plaintiff, a skilled boilermaker employed by defendant Owen-Ames-Kimball Company, suffered severe spinal injuries in an industrial accident in April, 1950. Since the accident he no longer has effective control of his body from his hips to his toes. Resumption of his skilled employment as a boilermaker is out of the question. Yet, by his own efforts since his injury, he has acquired the skills of a shop welder, an occupation he can perform, for a sympathetic employer, while seated.

At the time of plaintiff’s injury, section 9, part 21 of our workmen’s compensation law, provided that while an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lynch v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Verberg v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Markey v. S. S. Peter & Paul's ParishMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Lovalo v. Michigan Stamping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Redfern v. Sparks-Withington Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Johnson v. Harnischfeger Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Miller v. Sullivan Milk Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lockwood v. Continental Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Clark v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API