Westbrook v. Reeves & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wright District Court.— IIon. W. D. Evans, J udge. Action for breach of warranty, and to recover the purchase price of a threshing outfit .consisting of ■ an engine, separator, and necessary attachments. Triahto a jury, verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $669.59, and defendant appeals.—
1Opinion of the Court
Deemer, J.—
On- or about August 10, 1903, plaintiff purchased of defendant a threshing outfit consisting of an engine, separator, band cutter, weigher, stacker, etc., for the agreed price in the aggregate of $3,371.50. The order called for certain machinery, naming it and fixed a price on each article, that is to say, the engine was valued at $2,115.60, the separator at $645, the band cutter at $210, the stacker at $250, and other items at smaller amounts. The purchase price was represented by an old threshing outfit taken in exchange at the agreed price of $1,575, and by notes in various…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Fahey v. Esterley Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Young & Conant Manufacturing Co. v. WakefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Park v. Richardson & Boynton Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Nichols & Shepard Co. v. WiedemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Orenstein v. KahnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
- United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Bechtold v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Advance Thresher Co. v. VinckelNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. WhartonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.