Gerald Burke and James R. Novak v. Latrobe Steel Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents another variation of the question whether the court or contractual arbitration is the proper forum for resolving pensioners’ ERISA claims. In this case, although an arbitrator had ruled in favor of most of their plan interpretation contentions, plaintiff pensioners nonetheless pressed their allegation of statutory violations in the district court. We conclude that the arbitration requirement does not preclude resort to a judicial forum even though there may be a factual overlap between contractual and statutory claims. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schneider Moving & Storage Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santiago Amaro v. The Continental Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Arbitration Between United Industrial Workers, Service, Transportation, Professional Government v. Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Leckey v. StefanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Seborowski v. Pittsburgh Press Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Boivin v. US Airways, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Bowman v. Township of PennsaukenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.