Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Township of Pennsauken
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 28, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-87PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.
This matter was presented to the court soon after defendant Township of Pennsauken 1 passed Resolution 86-310 governing the outside employment of off-duty police officers. Specifically, the Resolution prohibited any direct employment of off-duty officers in security positions and required the channeling of all such employment through the Township police department under a number of terms and conditions set forth in a Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agreement. Plaintiffs, George Bowman and Fraternal Order of Police, Garden State Lodge # 3 (hereinafter FOP), 2…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Techsnabexport, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Smith v. Township of East GreenwichDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Kim Reuter v. Bob SkipperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Charles E. Williams v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Cooper v. City of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.