Legal Opinion

Leckey v. Stefano

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 31, 2007No. 06-2483, 06-3161, 06-3162PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

This is a battle for William Knapp’s estate. It is in federal court because he kept much of his wealth in employee benefit trusts that were subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Boiled down, plaintiff Janice Leckey, on behalf of herself and the estate of her deceased mother Evelyn Knapp (who initiated this suit before she died), claims that both ERISA and the terms of the various plans gave Evelyn 1 an interest in her husband’s ERISA benefits. He, however, took lump-sum distributions of almost…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Jennifer Sweda v. University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Robert Mator v. Wesco Distribution IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. IUE-CWA v. Visteon Corp. (In Re Visteon Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Brieger v. Tellabs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  5. Miller v. Mellon Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API