Legal Opinion

Begay v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 7, 2021No. 3:20-cv-08057Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Annabelle Begay, No. 3:20-cv-8057-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, an administrative agency of the 13 United States, 14 Defendant. 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 11) 16 and Defendant Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation’s (“ONHIR”) Cross-Motion 17 for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19). Plaintiff filed a Reply in support of her Motion and 18 Response to ONHIR’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21), and Defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API