Legal Opinion
Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 11, 1990No. 236-79CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
This is an application for attorney fees, wherein Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Company (Alaskan), Northern Border Pipeline Company (Northern), and Interstate Transmission Associates (Arctic) (ITA (Arctic)) seek an award of $218,735 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (West Supp.1989). Said application was filed as a consequence of our decision in Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Co. v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 723 (1986).1 In that case Alaskan and Northern were two among five natural gas pipeline companies who sought a $4,053,528.42…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- August Gava, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Naporano Iron and Metal Company, Andrew J. Naporano and Beatrice Naporano, Andrew J. Naporano and Sharon Naporano v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Devine v. SutermeisterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nevada Power Co. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loomis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- FDL Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Sharp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Greenberg v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
- Ohn J. Lokos v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991