Legal Opinion

McMahan & Baker, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 1, 1993No. 29035-5-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

McMahan & Baker, Inc., a structural engineering firm, appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Continental Casualty Company (Continental) in this coverage determination action. McMahan & Baker contends that the actions taken by its employee in performing a structural damage appraisal did not fall within a policy exclusion for claims arising out of the providing of cost estimates. We hold that the exclusion is ambiguous and therefore construe it in favor of the insured, McMahan & Baker. Thus, we reverse and remand for trial.

I

The Frindrich Claim

A vehicle traveling at a high rate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Washington Public Utility Districts' Utilities System v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Eurick v. Pemco Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Quadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Quadrant Corp. v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Paulman v. Gateway Venture Partners III, L.P. (In re Filtercorp, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Cook v. EvansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. In Re Filtercorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API