Washington Public Utility Districts' Utilities System v. Public Utility District No. 1
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
This case involves the validity and coverage of a self-insurance agreement executed jointly by Washington state public utility districts. Plaintiffs/appellants, Washington Public Utility Districts' Utilities System (WPUDUS), brought a declaratory action seeking a determination of its duty to provide coverage under such an agreement. On cross motions for summary judgment the Superior Court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment finding that the agreement was valid and provided coverage for the claims in question. We granted direct review.
There are two questions. First, whether a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Harmon v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Harmon v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Kish v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.