Paulman v. Gateway Venture Partners III, L.P. (In re Filtercorp, Inc.)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge:
We must decide whether under Washington law a security agreement that grants an interest in “inventory” or “accounts receivable,” without more, presumptively includes after-acquired inventory or accounts receivable. The bankruptcy court and Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) held that to secure after-acquired property, an express after-acquired property clause is required. We reverse, holding that Washington law would presume security interests in “inventory” and “accounts receivable” to include after-acquired property, absent evidence of intent to the contrary.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Grimmett v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Bullion Reserve of North America, a California Corporation, Debtor. Curtis B. Danning, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Michael L. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (In Re Thorpe Insulation Co.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re: Thomas John Slyman Debtor. Turtle Rock Meadows Homeowners Association v. Thomas John SlymanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- McLean v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Lopez v. Specialty Restaurants Corp. (In Re Lopez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of Valley-Vulcan Mold Co. v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. (In Re Valley-Vulcan Mold Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.