Legal Opinion
Shakin v. Abrams
United States District Court
Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGordberger, J.
On September 18th, 1933, plaintiffs recovered judgment against defendant in the sum of $144.75, thereupon application was made for an order to compel the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to satisfy said judgment out of moneys which it is alleged it has in its hands as belonging to the said Abrams. Prior to entry of judgment debtor entered into an agreement with the said insurance company as follows:
“May 3d, 1933.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.,
1 Madison Avenue, New York, N. Y.
Gentlemen:
In connection with my appointment as yonr agent, I hand you herewith the sum of $250 to be held and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walton v. HorkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- American Trust & Savings Bank v. O'BarrAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
- Barrett Co. v. United Building Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
- Millett v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- In re VernonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. RomanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Roman v. American Fire & MarineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995