Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Romano

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 29, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

196 N.J. Super. 229 (1984)

482 A.2d 50

SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., PLAINTIFF,

v.

PHILIP ROMANO, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Special Civil Part, Bergen County.

Decided June 29, 1984.

Pressler and Pressler, attorneys for plaintiff.

Kipp, Somerville & Kipp, attorneys for Garnishee, National Community Bank of New Jersey.

deCORDOVA, J.S.C.

In June, 1978 plaintiff Sears recovered a judgment by default against defendant Philip Romano. Plaintiff partially satisfied its judgment by levy on funds of the defendant, judgment-debtor in National Community Bank. Further attempts to satisfy the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Russell v. Fred G. Pohl Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Kronisch v. Howard Savings InstitutionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  4. Beninati v. HinchliffeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  5. Seventy-First Street & Broadway Corp. v. ThorneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EwingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  2. Waelder Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Southwestern Glass Co. (In Re Southwestern Glass Co.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Roman v. American Fire & MarineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  4. In Re: Southwestern Glass Company, Inc., Debtor. Waelder Oil & Gas, Inc. Fred J. Waelder v. Southwestern Glass Company, Inc. v. The Bank of Arkansas, Na, Garnishee/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API