Legal Opinion

Walton v. Horkan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1901PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Garnishment and claim. Before Judge Brinson. Richmond superior court. February 8, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

The record discloses that W. M. Walton executed and delivered to Maurice Walton an order addressed to the John P. King Manufacturing Company, the body of which read as follows: “Please pay Maurice Walton or order the amount you are due me in full, and oblige.” Before anything had been paid on this order, P. D. Horkan, a creditor of W. M. Walton who had instituted against him an action on account for $126’.18, caused a garnishment to be served upon the Manufacturing Company, requiring it to answer what it was indebted to W. M. Walton. The garnishee answered, admitting an indebtedness of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. First National Bank v. Hartman Steel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Haas v. Old National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bank of Cave Spring v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Southern Mutual Life Insurance v. DurdinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Few v. PouCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Goodwin v. Barre Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  5. Aetna Trust & Savings Co. v. NackenhorstIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API