Legal Opinion

Goldschmid v. Meline

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (Henderson, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.

The appeal in this case must be dismissed. The facts are these: One Rudolph Goldschmid brought suit in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County against Manche H. Meline and Louis D. Meline in assumpsit on a promissory note. The issues raised by the pleadings were tried, and the trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, Manche Meline. This judgment was entered on November the seventeenth, eighteen hundred and ninety-six. On January the twelfth, eighteen hundred and ninety-seven, the present appellant claiming to be the executrix of the last will of Rudolph Goldschmid, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swann v. Mayor of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
  2. Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  3. Carroll v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
  4. Harryman v. HarrymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Switkes v. John McShain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  2. Cardinell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Cardinell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API